
 
        
         
		112 
 FIG. 19 (below):  
 Plan of the audience hall:  
 proposed early and late  
 installation programs.  
 Schematic by Kathryn Boucher.  
 FIG. 20 (right):  
 Plaque: battle scene. 
 Benin, Nigeria. 16th century. 
 Copper alloy. H: 47 cm. 
 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Robert  
 Owen Lehman Collection, inv. L-G  
 7.35.2012.  
 Photograph © 2017 Museum of Fine  
 Arts, Boston. 
 10. Gore, op cit., 56; Paula Ben-Amos and Arnold Rubin, The  
 Art of Power, the Power of Art: Studies in Benin Iconography  
 (Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History, UCLA, 1983): 14.  
 11. Peter Goebel, Kunst Aus Benin: Afrikanische Meisterwerke  
 aus der Sammlung Hans Meyer (Leipzig: 1994): 26. 
 12. Plaques within subgroups often have nearly identical  
 measurements for both width and height. This detail suggests  
 to me that the artist applying the fl ange pattern also formed  
 the basic wax model.  
 13. Charles H. Read and O. M. Dalton, Antiquities from the  
 City of Benin and Other Parts of West Africa in the British  
 Museum (London: British Museum, 1899): 6. 
 14. Ibid.  
 15. The reluctance to accept the 1897 account may be due  
 to the courtiers’ more puzzling statements: They reported  
 that the plaques were made by a white man named  
 Ahammangiwa, who had many wives but no children and  
 made images of himself and his friends to hang in the oba’s  
 court. 
 FEATURE 
 that honored  his father’s  legacy and the  ceremonies  
 he instituted. The processional plaques,  
 made in series during this period, depicted the  
 recurrent expressions of the court’s loyalty that  
 could be expected by the mid-1550s. Orhogbua  
 also commissioned the fi rst battle panels,  
 plaques that brought the battlefi eld to the audience  
 court (fi g. 20). This strategy, as well as the  
 sudden increase in the number of plaques depicting  
 the  oba, demonstrated Orhogbua’s success  
 in expanding the kingdom while also visually  
 reminding the highest-ranking courtiers of the  
 oba’s dominance over the court.  
 CONCLUSION 
 Looking at the plaques as a single installation  
 changes the conversation about their patronage, 
  function, and dating. The evidence of the  
 plaques themselves, Benin oral history, and remaining  
 European sources make it  
 possible to imagine how the plaques  
 were made and installed, what narratives  
 they were intended to convey,  
 and who might have commissioned  
 them. My conclusions are speculative  
 but may provide a new way of thinking  
 about the corpus. I look forward  
 to other theories about the original  
 motives for the plaque commission,  
 the story told by the installation, and  
 the aesthetic and visual strategies artists  
 used to create  this monumental  
 testimony to the Kingdom of Benin. 
 NOTES 
 1. Benin “bronzes” are all copper alloys. Some are technically  
 made of bronze (copper alloyed with tin), but the majority  
 are technically made of brass (copper alloyed with zinc).   
 Throughout this article, we will refer to the artworks as  
 “bronze” in deference to their art historical category,  
 regardless of whether the object in question is made of bronze  
 or brass.  
 2. Through Robert Soppelsa’s work and my own research, I am  
 aware of 854 plaques said to be held in collections worldwide.  
 3. Translation of Olfert Dapper’s Naukeurige Beschrijvingen der  
 Afrikaensche gewesten, 1676 edition, published in Adam  
 Jones, Olfert Dapper’s Description of Benin (1668) (Madison:  
 University of Wisconsin Madison, 1998), 11. 
 4. Adam Jones, “Decompiling Dapper: A Preliminary Search for  
 Evidence” History in Africa 17 (1990): 182. 
 5. Field Museum 210365 is the only exception to this rule. I  
 believe it was made later to create a pair across the courtyard  
 when the pairing strategy became more important to the  
 organization of the program.   
 6. Philip J. C. Dark, “Benin Bronze Heads: Styles and  
 Chronology,” in African Images: Essays in African Iconology,   
 Daniel F. McCall and Edna G. Bay (eds.), Africana Publishing  
 Co.: 58.   
 7. Charles Gore, “Casting Identities in Contemporary Benin  
 City,” in African Arts 30, no. 3 (1997): 56, 60. 
 8. Kate Ezra, Royal Art of Benin: The Perls Collection in the  
 Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York: Metropolitan  
 Museum of Art, 1992): 47. 
 9. Irwin Tunis was the fi rst to suggest a narrow fi fty-year  
 production period for the plaques in his unpublished  
 dissertation “Origins, Chronology, and Metallurgy of the  
 Benin Wall Bas Reliefs” (London: School of Oriental and  
 African Studies, 1979), based on the similarity of the plaques’  
 alloys (Tunis 52), although he also suggested that plaques  
 were likely made in small numbers through the nineteenth  
 century. Josef Riederer argues that the relatively homogenous  
 composition of the metal forming the plaques, compared  
 to other Benin object classes, supports the proposal that  
 the corpus was created over a short period in his recent  
 article, “The Composition of Brass Objects from Benin,”  
 in Original—Copy—Fake? Examining the Authenticity of  
 Ancient Works of Art, Ernst Pernicka and Silke von Berswordt- 
 Wallrabe (eds.), Mainz: von Zabern, 2008): 145.