
 
		121 
 FIG. 41 (left):  
 Male fi gure. 
 Admiralty Islands, Papua  
 New Guinea. Before 1931. 
 Wood, vegetal fi ber, pigment.  
 H: 154.9 cm. 
 André Breton or Paul Éluard, Paris;  
 Étude Bellier, Hôtel Drouot, Paris,  
 2–3 July 1931, lot 122; Henry  
 Wellcome, London; the Wellcome  
 Trust, London. 
 Fowler Museum at UCLA, gift of the  
 Wellcome Trust, inv. X65.4990. 
 Photo: Don Cole. 
 FIG. 42 (right): Page from  
 the 1931 Breton/Éluard  
 catalog showing fi gures 41  
 and 43. 
 Image courtesy of the author. 
 FIG. 43 (right):  
 Gable fi gure, tekoteko. 
 Maori; probably Bay of  
 Plenty, New Zealand.  
 Before the 1920s. 
 Wood, obsidian, pigments. H: 96 cm. 
 William Ockleford Oldman, London;  
 André Breton or Paul Éluard, Paris,  
 presumably acquired from the above  
 in the 1920s; Étude Bellier, Hôtel  
 Drouot, 2–3 July, 1931, lot 142;  
 Helena Rubinstein, Paris and New  
 York, acquired at the above auction  
 via Paul Chadourne, Paris; Sotheby  
 Parke-Bernet, New York, 21 and  
 29 April 1966, lot 253; Harry A.  
 Franklin, Beverly Hills; Sotheby’s,  
 New York, May 2019, lot 42. 
 Private collection. 
 Photo courtesy of Sotheby’s. 
 works of African and Oceanic sculpture in fl ea  
 market stalls.29 The objects in his collection, in  
 turn, refl ected the classical sensibility of Apollinaire, 
  Guillaume, Clouzot, and Level. There  
 were extraordinary examples of a good number  
 of the forms that those early connoisseurs had  
 turned into icons: Fang  (FIGS. 58 and 62), Baule  
 (FIG. 66), and Dogon fi gures (FIG. 54); Kuba vessels; 
  Kota reliquaries (FIGS. 63 and 67); and Marquesan  
 sculptures (FIG. 11). 
 In a letter circulated to journalists in advance  
 of  the  sale,  Carré  made  the  story  that  he and  
 Ratton  wanted  to  tell  quite  clear.  Georges  de  
 Miré,  “cousin  of  the  painter  la  Fresnaye,  was  
 one of the fi rst to become interested in primitive  
 arts” and was therefore “able to assemble a  
 unique ensemble of sculptures.” The quality of  
 the pieces ensured that this “would be no ordinary  
 auction,” but would instead be “of more  
 interest  to  the  world  of  art  than  the  world  of  
 business.” That was not to say, however,  that  
 it would lose money: The de Miré sale, Carré  
 confi dently proclaimed, would generate prices  
 high enough to make it “an event that will be  
 to primitive sculpture what the Doucet sale was  
 to French art of the eighteenth century.”30  
 Though obviously intended for publicity purposes, 
   Carré’s  assertion  about  the  importance  
 of  the  de  Miré  sale  turned  out  to  be  correct.  
 The catalog included a number of objects that  
 would  go  on  to  become  world  famous.  From  
 the perspective of the history of taste, it is re-